Comments on: Should Collaborations Be Organic or Institutional? http://blog.digidave.org/2010/06/should-collaborations-be-organic-or-institutional Journalism is a Process, Not a Product Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:45:43 +0000 hourly 1 By: Social Hour follow-up: Links and resources « Digital Journalism Portland http://blog.digidave.org/2010/06/should-collaborations-be-organic-or-institutional/comment-page-1#comment-67069 Social Hour follow-up: Links and resources « Digital Journalism Portland Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:50:45 +0000 http://blog.digidave.org/?p=2438#comment-67069 [...] digidave.org: Should Collaborations Be Organic or Institutional? [...] [...] digidave.org: Should Collaborations Be Organic or Institutional? [...]

]]> By: Everything Old is New Again « Groundswell http://blog.digidave.org/2010/06/should-collaborations-be-organic-or-institutional/comment-page-1#comment-66503 Everything Old is New Again « Groundswell Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:13:08 +0000 http://blog.digidave.org/?p=2438#comment-66503 [...] the recent Future of News and Civic Media conference at MIT, I led a discussion on journalism collaborations. Scott Rosenberg, the co-founder of Salon, captured the tone of the [...] [...] the recent Future of News and Civic Media conference at MIT, I led a discussion on journalism collaborations. Scott Rosenberg, the co-founder of Salon, captured the tone of the [...]

]]> By: Phillip Smith http://blog.digidave.org/2010/06/should-collaborations-be-organic-or-institutional/comment-page-1#comment-66436 Phillip Smith Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:18:14 +0000 http://blog.digidave.org/?p=2438#comment-66436 Great summary, Dave. Many thanks for putting this post together. Phillip. Great summary, Dave. Many thanks for putting this post together.

Phillip.

]]> By: Anne-Marie McReynolds http://blog.digidave.org/2010/06/should-collaborations-be-organic-or-institutional/comment-page-1#comment-66435 Anne-Marie McReynolds Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:58:01 +0000 http://blog.digidave.org/?p=2438#comment-66435 Prioritizing collaboration over specialization prevents professionals from developing expertise. Author Morten Hansen argues in “Collaboration” that sometimes the goal of collaboration is collaboration in and of itself—which is dead wrong. Too many communities of practice translate to collaboration run amok. As Hansen states, the first rule of good collaboration entails evaluating whether or not there is a compelling benefit to working together. Hansen advocates saying no to projects that offer no ROI. Hansen, Morten. 2009. Collaboration: How Leaders Avoid the Traps, Create Unity, and Reap Big Results http://bit.ly/cV4NyF Prioritizing collaboration over specialization prevents professionals from developing expertise. Author Morten Hansen argues in “Collaboration” that sometimes the goal of collaboration is collaboration in and of itself—which is dead wrong. Too many communities of practice translate to collaboration run amok. As Hansen states, the first rule of good collaboration entails evaluating whether or not there is a compelling benefit to working together. Hansen advocates saying no to projects that offer no ROI.

Hansen, Morten. 2009. Collaboration: How Leaders Avoid the Traps, Create Unity, and Reap Big Results
http://bit.ly/cV4NyF

]]> By: Anne-Marie McReynolds http://blog.digidave.org/2010/06/should-collaborations-be-organic-or-institutional/comment-page-1#comment-66434 Anne-Marie McReynolds Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:53:30 +0000 http://blog.digidave.org/?p=2438#comment-66434 Prioritizing collaboration over specialization prevents professionals from developing expertise. Author Morten Hansen argues in "Collaboration" that sometimes the goal of collaboration is collaboration in and of itself—which is dead wrong. Too many communities of practice translate to collaboration run amok. As Hansen states, the first rule of good collaboration entails evaluating whether or not there is a compelling benefit to working together. Hansen advocates saying no to projects that offer no ROI. Source: http://bit.ly/cV4NyF Prioritizing collaboration over specialization prevents professionals from developing expertise. Author Morten Hansen argues in “Collaboration” that sometimes the goal of collaboration is collaboration in and of itself—which is dead wrong. Too many communities of practice translate to collaboration run amok. As Hansen states, the first rule of good collaboration entails evaluating whether or not there is a compelling benefit to working together. Hansen advocates saying no to projects that offer no ROI.

Source: http://bit.ly/cV4NyF

]]>