It’s not often that I get entwined into Digg politics. During the September boycott I stayed quiet. Although I helped journalists get in touch with Diggers that wanted to talk, I kept to myself — as I tend to do when it comes to Digg drama.
But right now I feel compelled to blog.
About two days ago I noticed a new Digger who was getting a lot of front page stories. My initial reaction. Good for him!

Sicc, with his light green play arrow, however, seemed to be everywhere I turned.
That’s fine Digidave — don’t think twice about it. I’ve seen plenty of people become obsessed with Digg. They’ll submit an unhealthy amount of stories until they clog my ‘friends submitted tool,’ and I can delete them and never worry about it again.
Then I came across this post, which broke down the numbers that Sicc has been churning out — and I realized that something fishy was going on.
Sicc joined Digg just over a month ago. In that month he has garnered:
An overall ranking of 57
Has Dugg 7,427 (NOTE: I’ve been on Digg almost a year and I have 8,041)
Submitted 933 stories
I’ve spoken with Jay Adelson before and one thing he stressed was that Digg is a self-policing community. It relies on individuals being taken to task. Assuming the information on Sicc has been overlooked, I’m going to take this post to put it out there in the open again to let the community come to their own judgments.
more))