For the most part I am going to leave the Revoltnation blog alone. It was a tool for organizing and the need for organizing around Digg has ceased…for now.
But I can’t keep my mouth shut about this issue that comes up whenever you discuss Digg. Inevitable you hear the same shouting match: Smaller diggers complain that the top diggers are keeping them down and top diggers complain that they have it too damn hard.
The algorithm change the other night was a tipping point for action, but it was not the impetus. Anybody who thinks it’s just a matter of ego’s clashing hasn’t participated in the community enough to realize that there is a serious lack of transparency.
That is and has always been the issue: Transparency.
Regardless of how you feel towards top-diggers (and this has never been an issue of "top diggers versus others" – and anybody who falls into that trap misunderstands the issue) you have to recognize something is important when the New York Times, the paper of record, publishes a story on it.
My only complaint about the story and how the larger community has taken it: The issue at hand is about transparency. Algorithm change, top diggers, cult of personality — all of this falls to the wayside. They are all a distant second.
Transparency is what makes a democracy run well. That is what we want – and it is upon the word of Jay and Kevin that they will provide a mode of communication that this mini-protest got called off.
|